With quotes from Ruben Verborgh
Here’s an archive.is version withouth the cookie hellscape: https://archive.is/K6IqZ
I guess both Solid and Safe both have promise, but they both have their problems too.
Safe is driven by their SafeCoin incentives, which is bad karma and could lend itself to more monopoly capitalism.
For its part, Solid is built on tech for permissions that can deny access to whole swaths of people, and if this is connected with identity schemes contemplated by the biosecurity state, it could be used to virtually enslave humanity.
So they both have their dangers too.
In my always humble opinion
btw its Ruben Verborgh I think
Oop - yes. Corrected. (Sorry Ruben!)