This has been an excellent discussion, thank you all for your thoughts. A forum member in another thread remarked on how difficult to follow this conversation is for those not up-to-date on the latest acronyms and industry terms. I myself had to google several of them. Obviously these terms are useful to those in the discussion and I wouldn’t ask you to have responded any differently. I wonder though - could I ask one of you to summarize the discussion in a more accessible manner? Y’all make such good points, I think a wider audience could benefit. P.S. This is not in any way a critique of the participants in this thread, rather wondering how this forum can support experts sharing their thoughts on a high level and those just coming on board or those who come to Solid from somewhere other than coding but need to understand these larger architectural issues.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How exactly does Solid decouple data and applications? | 18 | 4439 | March 14, 2019 | |
|
Is Solid primarily a privacy platform or an app platform
|
19 | 3596 | May 23, 2020 | |
| Solid scope and ecosystem | 45 | 4449 | November 15, 2020 | |
| What app would you love to see on Solid? | 86 | 19717 | April 5, 2022 | |
|
Inter-app access control
|
35 | 6066 | January 29, 2019 |